Colorism – Expanding Black Beauty by Kela Price

Colorism, discrimination based on skin tone, is a subset of racism and often exists within the African – American community. It is that elephant in society’s living room that no one wants to tell the entire truth about. This is mainly because even minorities don’t realize the conclusions that they derive based on skin tone. African-Americans are confused on where the problem currently exists; not where it started, but where it exists now.

 

I will preface what I’m about to say with the following: My mother’s side of the family is from Mississippi, and I love them all dearly. They are some of the kindest, sincere, hospitable people that you’d ever meet. I had the opportunity to visit them recently and as soon as I walked in the door of my grandmother’s house, my cousin said, “Hey Lilly White!” My brother’s best friend said, “Come and give me a hug with your high yellow ass.” My other cousin said, “Come here girl with your yellow conceited behind.”  They all said that I was yellow so I must be too good for the country. Of course they were saying it in a joking manner, so I didn’t take offense to it at all. But, it does prove that many still think that light skinned is some how more favorable than dark skinned.

 

 

Many studies and scholars suggest that these negative perceptions that are based on skin tone are one aspect of “cultural wounding.”  Shawn Alfonso-Wells, a visiting assistant professor of anthropology in Carnegie Mellow University’s history department, has studied racial classification in Cuba and the United States.

 

Nicole Ari Parker-5.JPG

 

“Here we are in the 21st century and once again those relationships that were forged under enslavement are coming to light again, all that between the domestic (house slave) and the field [slave], “ Dr. Alfonso-Wells said. “If you had lighter skin, your conditions weren’t as harsh. Those who were lighter skinned had more opportunities to escape their conditions than those who had darker skin, and you can still see that today.”

 

 

The fact of the matter is that yes, this is an old age struggle that began with slavery. However, the struggle has continued among African-Americans because we refuse to let it die. Black people are harder on other black people due to their skin tone. And, I understand it’s because our identity was stolen from us, but we know that now so why do we continue to tear each other down? Dark skinned isn’t good enough and light skinned people are just trying to be good enough because we think we’re white. What that says to me is neither is good because it’s not white. As a light skinned woman, I can accept this from whites, but it’s a hard pill to swallow when it comes from your own people.

 

I recently learned that in commemoration of Alpha Kappa Alpha’s 100 years of sisterhood and service, the Sorority unveiled the AKA Centennial Barbie Doll that was produced and marketed in partnership with Mattel. Before I even saw the doll, I read several emails and blog posts that suggested that this doll was causing tons of confusion among African-American sistahs. Apparently, some sistahs were really upset because the doll was a direct reflection of a light skinned, long-haired woman. Some thought she’d look better with darker skin and a fro. Many thought the doll continued to perpetuate the division among women who belong to sororities. According to them, AKAs are usually lighter skinned women who think they’re better than the other sororities. There were many, however, who were saddened by the fact that the color of the doll overshadowed the fact that this doll represents the first Barbie in Mattel’s franchise to honor a sorority on a milestone celebration.

 

 

Tyra Banks recently aired a show on the topic of light skinned versus dark skinned in hopes of expanding the idea of black beauty. Although it started a dialogue, which I think is needed in order to resolve old issues that aren’t yet dead; I don’t think Tyra accomplished her goal. However, it would be impossible to accomplish such a task in one show. At any rate, one guest was asked if he preferred light skinned or dark skinned women. When he said that he preferred dark skinned women, the applause and cheers were almost deafening. However, when another guest was asked who he preferred and stated that he liked light-skinned women, everybody booed. This is very offensive to me, mainly because I am a light skinned black woman who feels that she is just as black as any other African-American. My ancestors were brought over on the ship just like any other African-American’s ancestors. I can’t help the color of my skin any more than a darker skinned sistah can help the color of hers. Why am I continually penalized by my own people???

 

http://www.236.com/feed/2008/04/25/the_best_of_tyra_video_6121.php (copy and paste link in your browser to view clips of the light skinned versus dark skinned episode).

 

 

The question remains – “what’s the solution?”  No matter how we got here, how do we fix it?  I don’t want my children to have to endure this struggle among their own people. How do we create unity among us? How do we get each of us to understand that black is beautiful no matter what shade it comes in? How do we get each other to really believe (not just say it, but believe it) that black people come in all different shades and we are all descendants from Africa, even the light skinned blacks? How do we get each other to understand that light skinned blacks are not trying to be white? We can’t help the skin tone that we were born with just like dark skinned people can’t help what they were born with. Furthermore, how do we get each other to understand that our mission in life now needs to be about unity and educating ourselves on our history?  We need to develop a mentality that will allow us to take pride in our culture instead of trying to attach ourselves to somebody else’s or continually degrade our own. 

~ by blendingin on July 30, 2008.

11 Responses to “Colorism – Expanding Black Beauty by Kela Price”

  1. hmm.. thank you very much. usefull information

  2. glad you could shed some light on a dark situation :o )

  3. You know, I put that colorism post up about 6 months ago, received no feedback on it, took it down and then reposted it last month and now it seems like the elephant has been let out of the room for everyone to see bc I’ve been getting a lot of feedback about colorism. Unfortunately, some people are pretending to be (color) blind and not notice the elephant. But, I think you’re right in asking how do we break the cycle. I think that we must certainly pass on to our children (if we decide to have them) the historic legacy behind colorism and the positive idea that all shades of black are beautiful, but that beauty itself does not define a person. More so, I think that when some one says something that reinforces the color hierarchy, even of they are joking, like in the case of your relatives, it might prove useful to call them out, tastefully. Let me know if you try that. challenging family is always tough.
    Anyways I am uber glad that someone else is making space to dialogue about colorism. I think you said you wanted to use my post in a response blog. Sure go right ahead- anything to get the ball rolling.
    peace.

  4. You know, I put that colorism post up about 6 months ago, received no feedback on it, took it down and then reposted it last month and now it seems like the elephant has been let out of the room because I’ve been getting a lot of feed back on it. Unfortunately, some people are pretending to be (color) blind and not notice the elephant. But I think you’re right in asking how do we break the cycle. I think that we must certainly pass down to our children (if we decide to have them) the story behind the historic legacy of colorism and the positive idea that all shades of black are beautiful, but that beauty itself does not define a person. More so, I think that when some one says something that reinforces the color hierarchy, even if they are joking, like in the case of your relatives it might prove useful to call them out, tastefully. You might create the space for open dialogue. Let me know if you try that out. challenging relatives can be tough.
    Anyways,I am uber glad that someone else is making space for dialogue about colorism. I think you said you wanted to use my post as a response to your blog. go right ahead- anything to get the conversation flowing.
    peace.

  5. I received this on an e-mail forward:
    Oh and while I’m add it, according to an email I received, BET is saying “no” to black female hosts. Via Email:
    Sharon Carpenter, who is half Indian and half White, is bragging all over the internet and in interviews that BET went after her because they wanted her so badly. They didn’t think Black females could host a show. They have a Dominican American Rocsi as a female host of 106 and Park. They had a Puerto Rican Julissa as a host of the now defunct College Center, and now they got an Indian-European as a host for BET News. I won’t even mention how they used a lightskinned mixed woman to host BET African music just like they used Rachel to host Caribbean Rhythms. Sadly, colorism is still a problem in our community.
    Sian-Pierre Regis is the Asst to the VP of BET News. His phone number is (212) 975-1513 if you want to voice your complaint.
    Sadly, I believe it…

  6. “Dark skinned isn’t good enough and light skinned people are just trying to be good enough because we think we’re white.”
    U ought to be a bit more careful w/your word selection here, Love.

  7. “As a light skinned woman, I can accept this from whites, but it’s a hard pill to swallow when it comes from your own people.”
    The truth is that you are mixed-race. Black people see this, hence your difficulty w/acceptance.

  8. A comment on the term of ‘Light Skin Black’:

    .

    It is often a surprise for people to learn
    that, in reality, there is actually No Such
    Thing As a “Light Skinned Black” person.

    The term “Light Skinned Black” is really
    nothing more than a racist oxymoron
    that was created by White Supremacists
    in an effort to forcibly deny those Mixed-Race
    individuals, who are of a Multi-Generational
    Multiracially-Mixed (MGM-Mixed) Lineage, the
    right to fully embrace and to also received
    public support in choosing to acknowledge
    the truth regarding their full ancestral heritage.

    The people who have been slapped with
    the false label and oxymoronic misnomer
    of “Light Skinned Black” person are simply
    Mixed-Race individuals — whose family
    have been continually Mixed-Race
    throughout their multiple generations.

    For more information on MGM-Mixed
    lineage, feel free to view the information
    at the found at the links listed below:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3331

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1399

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1747

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1570

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1573

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1402

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1400

    Source(s):

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MGM-Mixed

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FGM-Mixed

    .

    – AP (soaptalk@hotmail.com)

    .

  9. .

    Since mention was made of the topic of ‘house
    and ‘field’ slave — I just wanted to note
    that — actually — this false concept
    that so many people have — that the
    lighter-complexioned chattel slaves
    “had it easier” or “thought they were
    better” than the darker-complexioned slaves
    – and / or “relaxed in the big house” while
    the darker-complexioned slaves “suffered in
    the fields” — is very much like the infamous
    ‘Willie Lynch Letter’ Hoax) all VERY MUCH AN
    URBAN MYTH (and is one which, in nearly every
    way that’s possible, completely defies
    the true historical recorded account.

    The historical record shows that
    those enslaved people who were of a
    lighter-complexion (i.e. mulatto-lineage)
    and that were found on the continental
    United States during the antebellum
    (chattel slavery) era were actually treated
    MUCH, MUCH WORSE than were those enslaved
    people who were of a darker-complexion.

    In fact, record shows that most of the White
    people (specially the White women) tended to
    look upon the lighter-complexioned slaves
    as being mere ‘mongrels of miscegenation’
    (resulting largely from the rapes caused
    by overseers); in their disgust at the sight
    of these slaves — insisted that they be
    “banished to the fields”; and also then
    purposefully reserved most of the ‘big
    house’ positions (ex. mammy, cook, driver,
    etc) for the darker-complexioned slaves —
    who most of the White people perceived as
    being “more loyal, docile, less competitive”
    – and, equally important, of a skin tone
    which could never cause them to be mistaken
    for ‘white’ or a possible member of
    the plantation owners’ own family.

    And this maltreatment was generally
    even much more so the case if the
    lighter-complexioned enslaved person
    was ’suspected’ (by a wife, sister or
    daughter — who ran “the big house”,
    while a ‘male’ family member ran “the
    plantation”) of possibly being the
    offspring of a plantation owner
    (or his son, father or brother).

    In addition, the few lighter-complexioned
    enslaved people that were actually permitted
    to do any work within the house were – as
    punishment for having the lowly status of
    “mongrel” and in order to make sure they
    did not become “too uppity” — kept under
    much more severe supervision (by both the
    White women who ran the plantation household
    and also by the darker-complexioned enslaved
    people) and under much more severe work
    detail than were most of the (more trusted)
    darker-complexioned enslaved people.

    Books by Deborah Gray White; Paula Giddings;
    J. California Cooper; bell hooks’, etc.
    expose the truth about the urban-myth and
    show that the lighter slaves received NO
    special treatment and were (as mere “mongrels
    of miscegenation”) usually treated much
    worse than were darker-complexioned slaves.

    Hope this information is helpful
    & that everyone has a great day.

    – AP (soaptalk@hotmail.com)

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MGM-Mixed
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FGM-Mixed

    Related Links:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3331
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1399
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1570
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1573
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1402
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1400
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1747
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1691
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ag4UceOKYaro21HdnN8w.mgjzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20071103085813AAolWV5
    (see ‘best answer’)
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtORF66bLNbNEjhIPDWC_6MjzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20071031122504AArGj8B
    (see ‘best answer’)
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SWIRLinc/message/17634
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SWIRLinc/message/17622

    .

  10. .

    Since mention was made of the topic of
    ‘house and ‘field’ slave — I just wanted
    to note that — actually — this false
    concept that so many people have — that
    the lighter-complexioned chattel slaves
    “had it easier” or “thought they were
    better” than the darker-complexioned slaves
    – and / or “relaxed in the big house” while
    the darker-complexioned slaves “suffered in
    the fields” — is very much like the infamous
    ‘Willie Lynch Letter’ Hoax) all VERY MUCH AN
    URBAN MYTH (and is one which, in nearly every
    way that’s possible, completely defies
    the true historical recorded account).

    The historical record shows that
    those enslaved people who were of a
    lighter-complexion (i.e. mulatto-lineage)
    and that were found on the continental
    United States during the antebellum
    (chattel slavery) era were actually treated
    MUCH, MUCH WORSE than were those enslaved
    people who were of a darker-complexion.

    In fact, record shows that most of the White
    people (specially the White women) tended to
    look upon the lighter-complexioned slaves
    as being mere ‘mongrels of miscegenation’
    (resulting largely from the rapes caused
    by overseers); in their disgust at the sight
    of these slaves — insisted that they be
    “banished to the fields”; and also then
    purposefully reserved most of the ‘big
    house’ positions (ex. mammy, cook, driver,
    etc) for the darker-complexioned slaves —
    who most of the White people perceived as
    being “more loyal, docile, less competitive”
    – and, equally important, of a skin tone
    which could never cause them to be mistaken
    for ‘white’ or a possible member of
    the plantation owners’ own family.

    And this maltreatment was generally
    even much more so the case if the
    lighter-complexioned enslaved person
    was ’suspected’ (by a wife, sister or
    daughter — who ran “the big house”,
    while a ‘male’ family member ran “the
    plantation”) of possibly being the
    offspring of a plantation owner
    (or his son, father or brother).

    In addition, the few lighter-complexioned
    enslaved people that were actually permitted
    to do any work within the house were – as
    punishment for having the lowly status of
    “mongrel” and in order to make sure they
    did not become “too uppity” — kept under
    much more severe supervision (by both the
    White women who ran the plantation household
    and also by the darker-complexioned enslaved
    people) and under much more severe work
    detail than were most of the (more trusted)
    darker-complexioned enslaved people.

    Books by Deborah Gray White; Paula Giddings;
    J. California Cooper; bell hooks’, etc.
    expose the truth about the urban-myth and
    show that the lighter slaves received NO
    special treatment and were (as mere “mongrels
    of miscegenation”) usually treated much
    worse than were darker-complexioned slaves.

    Hope this information is helpful
    & that everyone has a great day.

    – AP (soaptalk@hotmail.com)

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MGM-Mixed
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FGM-Mixed

    Related Links:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/3331

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1399

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1570
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1573

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1402
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1400

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1747

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1691

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ag4UceOKYaro21HdnN8w.mgjzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20071103085813AAolWV5

    (see ‘best answer’)

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtORF66bLNbNEjhIPDWC_6MjzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20071031122504AArGj8B

    (see ‘best answer’)

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SWIRLinc/message/17634
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SWIRLinc/message/17622

    .

Leave a Reply